Nokia phones "running" Android

A few years ago, I coaxed my Nokia N810 into running a prototype version of Android - NitDroid. The project has been resurrected by Stephen Hyde at NITDroid.com.

This latest video shows the Nokia N900 running Android's FroYo.

Why Is This Useful?

Nokia coined the term "Mobile Computer" for its range of phones. Computers aren't hermetically sealed consumer devices. They allow the customer to modify both hardware and software. You would be understandably upset if the computer you bought last year wouldn't let you install the latest version of Windows, MacOS, or Linux. But that's the situation mobile phone customers are faced with today.

The Android G1 has been abandoned by HTC and T-Mobile - much to the chagrin of customers. The HTC Hero has only been grudgingly updated to Android 2.1. Nokia left the N800 and N810 to rot. Nokia regularly stops development of its "mobile computer" software even when the devices are in active use.

Mobile phone manufacturers exist to sell phones. They don't get any extra revenue for releasing new firmware. Indeed, the cost of developing, testing, and shipping new firmware is prohibitively expensive. Not to mention dealing with customer complaints when things inevitably go wrong.

We are finally in a position to change that mindset. Hackers (in the original sense of the word) are now able to create custom firmware for new phones. Take a look at the XDA Developer Forums. Almost every Android phone released can have an improved firmware running on it.

True, a significantly older phone may not have hardware capable of running bleeding edge code - but it's enough to give it a new lease of life.

I'd love it if Nokia updated the N95 8GB firmware. The hardware is still incredibly capable.

In these tough economic times, it makes perfect sense to focus efforts on software, rather than hardware.

Look at the PS3 or the Xbox 360. A single model with firmware updates to increase its functionality.

Rather than tooling up a factory for a 6 month run of hardware - phone manufacturers should be looking to keep churning out a limited number of models of high spec phones for years. As manufacturing efficiencies improve, the hardware becomes cheaper and - like the PS3 and Xbox - cheaper models can be produced.

The PS3 came out in November 2006. Nearly 4 years ago. Can you think of a phone released four years ago which is still in production - let alone receiving firmware updates? The original iPhone was released in 2007 - it got a firmware update earlier this year but won't be receiving iOS4. Also, you can't buy a new iPhone 2G. Apple aren't in the business of selling inexpensive hardware.

The Future

I predict - or rather, I hope - we will see the following pattern emerge. Either from Google or Nokia.

• An insanely expensive and over-spec'd phone will be released.  I expect in the £500 - £1,000 range.
• A public roadmap for its OS will be released - new features promised every 3-6 months.
• A guarantee that official firmware development will continue for at least 3 years.
• The OS will be sufficiently open to allow "homebrew" firmware to run.  Hackers will jump at it.
• The hardware will sell - poorly at first.
• As production efficiencies are found, the price will come down.  The hardware capabilities will stay compatible with older models.
• The firmware will progress based upon consumer need, manufacturer desire and what hackers manage to achieve.
• At around the 18 month mark, major new features in the firmware will be announced.  This keeps the MNO happy as they don't have to subsidise the cost of new hardware for customers coming to the end of their contracts.
• At the 2 year mark, the next hardware revision will be launched.  More memory and megapixels - cheaper price.
• If the hardware is still selling, expect others to follow.

The fly in the ointment for this is continuous manufacturer profitability.  Apple, I understand, gets a cut of call and text revenue.  Google gets a cut of apps sold.  Microsoft and Sony sell licences for releasing games on their platform.

Would this "super phone" have to sell firmware updates?  Would MNOs subsidise firmware rather than hardware?  Would customers part-exchange  an unfashionably old phone for the latest model?

Or will we be stuck with phones that are thrown on the scrap-heap by their creator in order to force us into buying the latest model?

One thing's for certain.  Where there are hackers - there will always be updates.

Dead BlackBerry

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

Due to a crazy taxi driver (are there any other kind) and a violent swerve, my BlackBerry Bold 9000 is no more. Bereft of life, it rusts in pieces, and other such Pythonesque metaphors.

Arse. I truly feel like I'm missing an extension to my body. There's a symbiotic relationship which develops between a geek and his phone. It entertains me, informs me, keeps me on time and allows me to rapidly communicate with a variety of methods. In return, I feed it electricity, load it up with useful programs, decorate its skin and snuggle up to it.

I miss it so much.

Every Cloud...

Now's a prime time to choose a new smartphone. So many new models on the market. Which to go for?

What I look for in a mobile

I've had many many phones. Some wonderful (Treo 180) some dire (Apple iPhone). I know exactly what I want and what I need.  For a device that I use several times an hour every single day, I don't want to compromise on any aspect.  Perfection is what I demand.  So, what was it that made the BlackBerry Bold the perfect phone for me?

• Physical keyboard.  I do a lot of typing on the device.  I've used soft keyboards (Android, iPhone, Storm) and they just don't do it for me.  Even with the haptic feedback, it's just not the same for speedy typing.  I liked handwriting recognition on the Treo 180 and the Nokia N97 - but in terms of speed & accuracy a physical keyboard is a must.  More than that, it needs to be a good keyboard.  The keyboard on the N97 is dreadful - it feels like a cheap calculator.  The N810 has an awful layout and virtually no travel on the button push. I need raised keys and to feel a click so I can touch-type.
• Exchange integration.  I use my device for work.  Things which I regularly use my 'berry for are were: email and calendar sync'd over the air.  Address lookup - if I meet Jo Blogs at work, I can type her name in to the address book and look up her email, phone number, address etc (if she's in the corporate address book).
• The BlackBerry Enterprise messenger is also really useful.  I don't use IM for personal use much any more - but work runs on it.  Sadly it's basaed on Microsoft Office Communicator rather than anything open or useful.
• Quick start-up.  When you shut down a BlackBerry, it effectively goes into "suspend" mode.  I switch it on first thing in the morning and it's on and receiving email instantly.
• Auto on-off.  At 2300 every weekday, my phone shuts down. So if I've forgotten to switch it off, I don't get disturbed during the night.  At 0700 it wakes up and gets to work.
• Multiple email accounts.  I want to reply from 1 enterprise and 2 personal accounts.
• USB interface for charging.  Batter life isn't massivly important and I'm never away from a power socket for a few hours.
• Compatible with Linux for charging, reading files, tethering.
• Speed dial, form factor, excellent hierarchical bookmarks structure.
• GPS & Mapping.
• Good browser.  I like the modern RIM browser - I know they're moving to Webkit, but I don't find the current one so bad.

Well, so far it looks like I'm going for a BlackBerry. Right.  Not quite.

What I hate about BlackBerry

• No front-facing-camera.  I like video calling. I'm the only one in the UK who does, apparently.  But with more 3G phones coming on to the market, I'm hopeful that more people will come round to it.
• Lack of updates.  It seems to take ages for any new developments to come out of RIM.  I understand why - you can't fiddle around too much with business critical devices - but I like shiny new features.
• Speed. Perhaps it's running OS 5.0 on the 9000, but everything seems a little sluggish.  I'm very quick with my fingers yet I often feel like the 'berry isn't working as fast as I am.  Once you're running IM, SocialScope, Facebook and Weather at the same time and everything slows to a crawl.
• Camera. I like the flash and the geo-tagging, but the quality of images isn't wonderful.  No focusing also impacts scanning QR codes.
• Video recording - low quality and sound is often out of sync.
• Calendar - only shows a single calendar. I don't want my personal appointments on my work calendar.
• Media player. While it plays some .avi files better than Android, it won't do .ogg or .flac, the interface is sub par.

The Android Intervention

With my dearly departed long gone, I'm reliant on my Android device. An HTC Hero.  It is a stunning device.

• Gorgeous screen, very responsive.
• Browser is good.
• The camera is great although sorely lacking a flash.
• It integrates with Microsoft Exchange reasonably well - although I haven't got it fully working yet.

But - and there's always a but...

• HTC. They are very unresponsive to customer queries. No software updates for the Hero, even though they've been announced.  Again, I understand the reasoning, but I don't want to be stuck on Android 2.1 when 3.9 is out.
• Slow start up.  I don't want to wait 60 seconds for my phone to wake up.
• Lacking in functionality - although it has plenty of add on software, some at cost.
• Lack of keyboard shortcuts.  I rely on these heavily - as described in my comment to The Really Mobile Project.
• Such tie in to the Google Eco-System.  If I ever want to leave Google, I'm not sure how the phone would cope.

Others

I'm big on Linux. Despite the slight disappointment with Nokia's recent efforts, I'm intrigued by the N900.  I think I'd like to play with it for a day - especially the keyboard given the disaster of the N810 - before comitting.

I've tried a 3G iPhone running OS3.0.  It's a toy and really not suitable for me.

Windows Mobile is... lackluster.  I can't wait for Windows Phone OS 7.0 Mobile (or whatever they're calling it today).  Besides, I don't run Windows on my PCs - I can't think of a reason to run it on my phones.

What else is out there?  Bada? Doubt Samsung call pull it off.  Pre? I want to like Palm, but it's restricted to a single device and only on one network. Symbian? Hopefully it will be resurrected but after the disasterous N97 and the abandoned N95, it's dead to me.

Choices

I think it boils down to three phones.

BlackBerry 9700

Bold 9700

This is the "safe" choice.  It's the next model up from my smashed 9000.  I know it does everything I want.  I like the idea of replacing the trackball with a touchpad.  Good that it's got the new standard USB charger, even if I'll need to buy some new cables.

On the down side, it's a bit boring.

SonyEricson Experia X10 mini pro / Motorola Milestone / Droid

My Android choice.  Has a keyboard and avoids HTC.  I don't know how hackable it will be.  Given it's one of SE's & Moto's first forays into Android, I'm concerned about how committed they'll be to the device.

Would really like an Android with a decent keyboard - there are just so few of them about.

Nokia N900

Nokia N900

The outside choice. I generally love Nokia hardware - but their software sucks.  As innovative as the N810 was, they really dropped the ball in providing updates to their original Maemo software.  I'm slightly wary about how well this will be supported.

The keyboard looks ok, but the oddly placed space bar puts me off, as does the lack of ergonomic consideration.

Your Opinions

I'd love to know what you think.  Which phones rock your world?

This blog is a personal comment and does not represent my employers, Vodafone Group.  Nothing in this blog should be considered an official position on any phone, platform or manufacturer.