Review: Watchy - an eInk watch full of interesting compromises


The last smartwatch that I tried was some awful early Sony device with a locked-down ROM. The battery died after a day and I couldn't find the proprietary charger. It slurped up all my data. It was garish to look at. And it was expensive.

The Watchy is the opposite in every single conceivable way.

It is an Arduino powered, open source, eInk display, with no data guzzling tendancies. And is only £60 including delivery. It's gorgeous to look at without being distracting, has a massive battery life, and allows for a bunch of tinkering.

But...

Ah... Let's get it out of the way. This is not a consumer product. It is fiddly to assemble, has very little protection for its delicate components, and to change the timezone you have to recompile the firmware!

Oh, and it uses USB-Micro rather than USB-C 😡

The watch ships in kit form and is not overly satisfying to build. The buttons are especially fiddly to fit, the instructions assume you know how to open a ribbon connector, and there's warnings about how fragile everything is. Took me about 20 minutes all in - and that was mostly aligning the buttons.

Raw circuit board and battery.

But, once built, it does look great. Here are my first impressions:

It is an fun device to play with. But the whole thing is built on a set of (very reasonable) compromises.

The eInk screen is a delight to look at and helps keep the battery lasting for ages. There's no backlight - but that also makes it less of a flashy distraction.

The eInk screen is fragile. Yet, bizarrely, the watch comes with zero protection. There is no plastic shield to keep it from getting bumped or scratched. I appreciate that might cause glare or get dust trapped in it - but I don't think the deep bezel is going to protect that screen.

Similarly, there's no water ingress protection. I wasn't expecting a diver's watch with rubber gaskets - but I'd be nervous about wearing this in the rain. You can 3D print your own case, or buy a different one - but that adds to the cost.

There's no speaker - again, less distracting than other watches. The vibration motor is sufficiently powerful to discreetly alert you to anything important.

There's no touchscreen - again, saves on power and protects the screen. But the buttons are hard, loud, and just don't feel nice. Luckily WiFi can be set up by connecting to the device's own SSID. I was dreading the thought of having to enter details using those buttons!

It won't monitor your heart rate, sweatiness, or blood pressure - nor will it try to sell those data to perverts on the Internet. It does have a step-counter which uses an accelerometer to keep track of your movement.

It can't pair to your headphones for listening to music - but you can use BLE for firmware updates and WiFi for NTP.

You can reprogram it! But there's only 3,673,264 bytes to play with, so you can't squeeze to much in there. Oh, and the instructions are the usual half-finished & untested set of scattered files beloved by hackers.

There's no weird proprietary connectors needed to charge it. But it uses USB-Micro. So you'll have to dig out one of those old cables that you kept when the world moved over to USB-C.

Watch with a big USB cable plugged in.

Do you see what I mean? It isn't quite as spartan as the Casio F-91W, but it is missing some things you may find essential in a modern watch.

I'm conflicted. I love everything eInk. I like devices which are fully under my control. I don't want to wear something expensive and distracting on my wrist. I want to change the watchface to match my mood.

But... I don't want to wear something fragile. If I go abroad, I don't want to lug a laptop with me just to change timezone. I'm not sure I want to learn yet another programming paradigm. And, if I'm recharging something, I want it to use the same connector as every other gadget I've bought in the last few years.

I enjoy tinkering. But the instruction on the website are incomplete and hard to follow. I've sent a pull request to fix some of the errors I found. Eventually, after some confusion, I was able to download a face, edit the settings, and flash it.

A watch showing the correct time. There is some blurred code on the computer screen behind it.

I'm going to spend a few weeks playing with it. The Watchy is crammed full of possibilities. But it remains to be seen if I can fulfil them.

Verdict

Share this post on…

  • Mastodon
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • BlueSky
  • Threads
  • Reddit
  • HackerNews
  • Lobsters
  • WhatsApp
  • Telegram

7 thoughts on “Review: Watchy - an eInk watch full of interesting compromises”

  1. said on mastodon.me.uk:

    @Edent I was tempted by the eInk screen but ended up accidentally buying a Bangle.js instead (special offer)! The screen isn't quite as nice but it has a daylight readable lcd which works really well. The watch is also a tad more practical based on your video. The docs/examples/etc. for creating your own apps are great, and being able to host your own appstore on github pages is fantastic. I still like the idea of an eink watch though!

    Reply | Reply to original comment on mastodon.me.uk
  2. said on mastodon.bentasker.co.uk:

    Yet, bizarrely, the watch comes with zero protection.

    The FAQ makes reference to a screen protector (https://watchy.sqfmi.com/docs/faqs/).

    In the box there was something that looked about the right size, but I eventually gave up trying to get both the paper off both sides (to the extent, I'm not convinced it actually is a protector).

    The exposure of the screen bothers me too. Even the anodised cases don't seem to include a covering for it. Frequently Asked Questions | Watchy

    Reply | Reply to original comment on mastodon.bentasker.co.uk
  3. said on linuxrocks.online:

    @Edent
    That looks nice, but I think I'm going to get a Bangle.js 2 sometime soon instead.
    I have a Pinetime and it's good for most things, except it doesn't have a GPS and InfiniTime still has some minor issues and missing features for what I do with a watch...
    I currently wear a Casio WS-2000H, which is a good step tracking "dumb" watch that has a 200 lap stopwatch memory that I use to record runs. Also it's a Casio, and has survived a good few slaps on the corners of miscellaneous pieces of furniture as well as supposedly running for 3 years before a battery replacement.

    Reply | Reply to original comment on linuxrocks.online

What links here from around this blog?

What are your reckons?

All comments are moderated and may not be published immediately. Your email address will not be published.

Allowed HTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> <p> <pre> <br> <img src="" alt="" title="" srcset="">