Is enhancement the same as manipulation?


Screenshot of a BBC news article. Jurors shown video 'of felling of Sycamore Gap tree'

How far can you enhance an image or video before you cross the line into manipulation? The UK is currently prosecuting two men accused of a crime. Part of the prosecution's evidence is a video. In showing it to the jury, the prosecution have said: the two minute and 41 second-long video is "extremely dark" but the "unmistakeable" noise of a chainsaw can be heard followed by the sound of a tree…

Continue reading →

How to Dismantle Knowledge of an Atomic Bomb


A confused little cardboard robot is lost amongst the daisies

The fallout from Meta's extensive use of pirated eBooks continues. Recent court filings appear to show the company grappling with the legality of training their AI on stolen data. Evidence shows an employee asking if what they're doing it legal? Will it undermine their lobbying efforts? Will it lead to more regulation? Will they be fined? And, almost as an afterthought, is this fascinating…

Continue reading →

The AI Exorcist


Book cover. A distorted Kraken appears on an old fashioned computer screen. Several hands type on distorted keyboards.

Asbestos was the material that built the future! Strong, long lasting, fire-proof, and - above all - completely safe for humans. Every house in the land had beautiful sheets of gloriously white asbestos installed in the walls and ceilings. All the better to keep your loved ones safe. The magic mineral was woven into cloth and turned into hard wearing uniforms. You could even get an asbestos…

Continue reading →

GitHub's Copilot lies about its own documentation. So why would I trust it with my code?


Me asking Copilot how I switch it off. Copilot responds with a link.

In the early part of the 20th Century, there was a fad for "Radium". The magical, radioactive substance that glowed in the dark. The market had decided that Radium was The Next Big Thing and tried to shove it into every product. There were radioactive toys, radioactive medicines, radioactive chocolate bars, and a hundred other products. The results weren't pretty. In the early part of the 21st…

Continue reading →

LLMs are good for coding because your documentation is shit


A pet cat typing on a computer keyboard.

That's it. That's the post. Fine! I'll expand a little more. Large Language Models are a type of Artificial Intelligence. They can read text, parse it, process it using the known rules of English, and then regurgitate parts of it on demand. This means they can read and parse a question like "In Python, how do I add two numbers together?" and then read and parse the Python documentation. It…

Continue reading →

Why do people focus on AI's failures?


A robot with a backlit human face.

I saw a prominent AI proponent asking why people always focus on the things that AI gets wrong. AI works so well, he asserted, that it was churlish and childish to focus on a few minor mistakes? Which reminds me of an experience I had a few years ago. I was in a rural pub and got chatting to one of the locals. We were getting on great, so I asked him what his name was. "You know," he said,…

Continue reading →

The (theoretical) risks of open sourcing (imaginary) Government LLMs


A t-shirt with the slogan "Make things open it makes things better."

Last week I attended an unofficial discussion group about the future of AI in Government. As well as the crypto-bores who have suddenly pivoted their "expertise" into AI, there were lots of thoughtful suggestions about what AI could do well at a state level. Some of it is trivial - spell check is AI. Some of it is a dystopian hellscape of racist algorithms being confidently incorrect. The…

Continue reading →

Book Review: You Look Like a Thing and I Love You by Janelle Shane


Book cover featuring a hand drawn robot.

A week is a long time in politics and a couple of years is an aeon in AI. Published in 2019, just before the dawn of the LLM, this is an overview of all the weird and charming ways Artificial Intelligence can go wrong. It is fully of delightfully silly examples and rather charming illustrations. Lots of the examples are drawn from the always-entertaining AI Weirdness blog. But it does suffer…

Continue reading →

AI isn't a drill, and your users don't want holes


A confused little cardboard robot is lost amongst the daisies

There's a popular saying; "No One Wants a Drill. What They Want Is the Hole". It's a pithy (and broadly) correct statement. But I don't think it goes far enough. Let's apply the Five Whys method to the issue: No one wants a drill. What they want is the hole. No one wants a hole. What they want is a picture hook. No one wants a picture hook. What they want is art hanging on the walls. No one…

Continue reading →

A whimsical fuzzy clock


Beneath the moon's glow, secrets find their release. In this enchanted hour, let desires run wild. Tread lightly, for mischief lurks in every shadow. Oh, sweet temptation! Yield to its seductive call. In the realm of dreams, reality fades away. Embrace the whimsy that dances upon moonlit beams. Amidst the night's embrace, secrets are whispered.

I'm sure I remembered there once being a clock app for Linux which was deliberately vague. It would declare the time as "Nearly tea-time" or "A little after elevenses" or "Quite late" or "Gosh, that's early". But I can find no evidence that it ever existed and am beginning to wonder if I dreamt it. So I built it. First thing's first - there are a lot of existing fuzzy clocks. But they mostly…

Continue reading →

Fruit Of The Poisonous LLaMA?


A confused little cardboard robot is lost amongst the daisies

A group of authors are suing various vendors of Large Language Model AIs. The authors claim that the AIs are trained on material which infringes their copyright. Is that likely? Well, let's take a quick look at the evidence presented. First up, Meta's LLaMA Paper. It describes how the LLM was trained: We include two book corpora in our training dataset: the Gutenberg Project, which contains…

Continue reading →

What obvious thing are we missing? And can AI help?


A robot with a backlit human face.

I'm obsessed with the idea that human progress could be accelerated - if only we realised how to properly combine existing technology. I don't want to go "Ancient Aliens" here - but even a cursory reading of scientific history will show you were humanity's progress could have been dramatically fast if only knowledge was more widely shared and recognised. The book "How To Invent Everything" makes …

Continue reading →