A seemingly simple question which sent me down into the murky depths of standards. How many consecutive hyphens can you have in a domain name? It probably isn't sensible to name your online presence a----------hyphen.com - but is there anything technically stopping you?
History
Let's do some history!
This is 1978's "HOST NAMES ON-LINE". Early Internet standards described the - character as "minus" rather than hyphen.
up to 48 characters drawn from the alphabet (A-Z),
digits (0-9), and the minus sign (-) ... specifically, no blank or space characters allowed;
no distinction between upper and lower case letters;
the first character is a letter;
the last character is NOT a minus sign;
no other restrictions on content or syntax.
So, originally, you could have as many hyphens as you wanted after the first symbol - which had to be a letter. The last symbol had to be a letter or number0.
That was later formalised in 1981's "DoD INTERNET HOST TABLE SPECIFICATION"
RFC 810 GRAMMATICAL HOST TABLE SPECIFICATION
<name> ::= <let>[*[<let-or-digit-or-hyphen>]<let-or-digit>]
That's carried in the the slightly more modern RFC 952.
By the time we hit 1987, the word "minus" has gone. Note, there are no restrictions on the number of hyphens - just as long as your domain name doesn't start or end with one1.
RFC 1035 2.3.1. Preferred name syntax
The labels must follow the rules for ARPANET host names. They must start with a letter, end with a letter or digit, and have as interior characters only letters, digits, and hyphen.
By 1989, the "DOMAIN NAMES - IMPLEMENTATION AND SPECIFICATION" was tweaked again:
RFC 1123 2. GENERAL ISSUES
The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952. One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the restriction on the first character is relaxed to allow either a letter or a digit. Host software MUST support this more liberal syntax.
And, from then on, things stayed pretty stable until the futuristic year 2010. That was when Internationalised Domain Names (IDN) became available. They use the xn-- string at the start of the name so, the spec now says:
RFC 5891 4.2.3.1. Hyphen Restrictions
The Unicode string MUST NOT contain "--" (two consecutive hyphens) in the third and fourth character positions and MUST NOT start or end with a "-" (hyphen).
What they really mean is that "--" is banned in position 3 & 4 unless the first two characters are "xn"2.
So, in theory, you can have up to 59 consecutive hyphens by ensuring that they start in position 4 and end at position 62.
Something like abc---[…]---z.com should be fine.
OR IS IT?!?!?
TLD Restrictions
There's what the RFC's say, and what a Top Level Domain (TLD) will allow. The Registry (the organisation which administers the TLD) may set their own, more restrictive, policies. Some will ban naughty words, or refuse IDN registrations, or prevent impersonation of Public Suffix domain, etc.
For example, South Sudan's .ss policies refuse to allow any hyphens.
Nominet, who run the .uk Registry, don't have any restrictions on the use of hyphens other than refusing to register xn-- domains.
But, in general, you can register multi-hyphened domain names with most Registries.
Anomalies
Of course, the mighty Internet mostly runs on spit and hope3. Naturally there are going to be mistakes, glitches, exceptions, and anomalies.
My delightful friend Q Misell had a rummage through her archives and helped track down some of the domain names which violate the modern rules. It's somewhat difficult to query every domain name, nevertheless, there are hundreds of multi-hyphened domains lurking within DNS.
Some, like ok--computer.com are long dead, but some are still active4!
Possibly the most consecutive hyphens belongs to http://a-------------------------------------------------------------a.com/
Sixty-one hyphens! The maximum possible, and it still works! The website looks like it hasn't been updated since it was first registered in 2000.
But what about more modern domains? The spookily named http://zz--icann-monitoring.uk/ was registered in 2024 - long after the rules were updated. But as Nominet doesn't allow xn-- domains, I guess it is fine?
There are some domains like bq--3bhauz7frjrgbka.com which look like they were pseudo-randomly generated. Perhaps as command-and-control servers?
Here's a quick table showing some of the ones Q found:
| Domain | Creation Date | Status |
|---|---|---|
0-------------------------------------------------------------0.com
|
1999 | Down |
0-------------------------------------------------------------5.com
|
2001 | Live |
0---------------------0.com
|
2000 | Live |
0----------------0.com
|
2000 | Live |
0---------0.com
|
2000 | Live |
pr--newswire.org.uk
|
2005 | Down |
0o--o0.com
|
2000 | Down |
a-----a.net
|
2000 | Down |
pr--newswire.uk
|
2019 | Down |
uk--domain--names.uk
|
2019 | Live |
zz--icann-monitoring.uk
|
2024 | Live |
cd--storage-shelves.co.uk
|
2012 | Live |
mb--uk.co.uk
|
2015 | Live |
o---t.co.uk
|
2016 | Live |
om--tat-sat.co.uk
|
1999 | Live |
pr--newswire.co.uk
|
2005 | Down |
uk--domain--names.co.uk
|
2000 | Down |
we--buy--any--car.co.uk
|
2009 | Down |
i---i.net
|
2001 | Down |
a-------------------------------------------------------------a.com
|
2000 | Live |
a---b.com
|
2000 | Down |
v---v.net
|
2000 | Down |
we--care.net
|
1999 | Down |
b---h.com
|
2001 | Down |
bq--3bhauz7frjrgbka.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--3bhauz7frjrgbkdcia.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--3cbpcty2rjyq.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--744a.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--abs7czi.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--abxgt4lb.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--azbukkckjavdc.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--azdecny.com
|
2000 | Live |
bq--eh7xj73b75xp62x7mh7xgah7ad7xj73b75xa.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--gbbpy2enmnhq.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--gbtfs2a.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--s7z76.com
|
2000 | Down |
bq--zzzz.com
|
2000 | Down |
c-------7.com
|
2001 | Live |
f---you.com
|
1998 | Down |
id--design.com
|
1999 | Down |
ok--computer.com
|
2001 | Down |
t---28.com
|
2000 | Live |
t---taz---t.com
|
2001 | Down |
Note, "Live" just means an HTTP request returned something. There may, of course, be other services running on that domain, or on subdomains.
So What?
Without a full list of every domain name, it's rather hard to draw firm conclusions. But, in the absence of anything better to do, here are some thoughts.
- Most people don't want multiple consecutive hyphens in their domain names. They're unwieldy but mostly not prohibited.
- If the authors of RFC 5891 had access to a full list of domains, might they have chosen a different syntax for Punycode?
- Why is it so hard to look through every single registered domain name anyway? Even Certificate Logs no longer seem to be easily searchable.
- Are there any other weird restrictions which are violated by older domain names?
- When will DNS finally go all-in with Unicode rather than this kludge? (Probably around the same time as IPv6 adoption!)
If you know of any weird multi-hyphenated domains, please stick a comment in the box 😊
-
Way back in the year 1999, several domains were registered with trailing hyphens. This was swiftly corrected and the domains deleted. ↩︎
-
Note, I think this is when domain names expanded from 48 characters to 63. But that's a different Yak to Shave. ↩︎
-
I wonder why this isn't zero-based like so many other computery things. But that's a different rabbit hole. ↩︎
-
And, so I'm told, a cabal of vicious Furries waiting to pounce. ↩︎
-
There are also quite a few for sale. ↩︎
7 thoughts on “How many consecutive hyphens can you have in a domain name?”
@Edent "Why is it so hard to look through every single registered domain name anyway? Even Certificate Logs no longer seem to be easily searchable."
I feel you on that problem!
(.UK ones are if you are a nominet member or know a member to get the CSV.)
| Reply to original comment on know.me.uk
@blog "If the authors of RFC 5891 had access to a full list of domains, might they have chosen a different syntax for Punycode?". As I recall, the working group asked IANA to run a search on this, as a proxy for the full list, but @paulehoffman would probably have the details.
| Reply to original comment on mastodon.social
I may know the origin of footnote number 3 😂 (someone much funnier than me).
| Reply to original comment on bsky.app
You can get access to a lot of domain name registration lists via https://czds.icann.org/ . My login has expired so I can't check which TLDs are currently available: I know 8 years ago .uk wasn't but .com, .net etc were
@Edent I'm a little surprised that registrars aren't all over this to ensure that their domain names are em-dash enabled for the agentic future...
| Reply to original comment on cyberplace.social
@Edent @CenturyAvocado see section 3 for where I got the data used here: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3730567.3764501
| Reply to original comment on glauca.space
@fuzzyfuzzyfungus @Edent thethingwithfeathers—.com
| Reply to original comment on social.vivaldi.net
More comments on Mastodon.