Terence Eden. He has a beard and is smiling.
Theme Switcher:

The UK Government's Low Value Purchase System is a Waste of Time

· 4 comments · 450 words · Viewed ~3,674 times


It can be hard running a small business. If you want to sell to a large organisation like the UK Government, there are forms to fill in, checks to comply with, tenders to bid on, and a hundred other things.

Luckily, there's the RM6237 Low Value Purchase System to make everything better. If a department wants to buy something below a certain threshold, they can contact any of the registered suppliers and just buy it. No complicated paperwork, cheaper prices, win-win!

Except, there's on annoying bit of bureaucracy. Every month I have to tell the Government Commercial Agency what business I've done.

Hello Terence Eden, It’s time to report your management information to the Government Commercial Agency (GCA). If you didn’t do any business, you still need to use this service to let us know. 9 April 2026 is the deadline to report your March 2026 data You need to report for the following commercial agreement(s):-   RM6237 – Low Value Purchase System Report your management information If you don’t think you should be getting this reminder or there is a problem reporting, please email the support team: Regards, GCA MI collection team

Fair enough, I guess. Let them know how many paperclips I've sold to the Ministry of Administrative Affairs.

But there's a wrinkle. What if I've sold nothing? Well, I still have to log on, wait for an MFA code to be send, click through, and report "No Business".

Screenshot with a button to report no business.

I think that's a waste of time. But I wondered how much time it collectively wastes for the nation's small businesses.

So I filed a Freedom of Information request to see how many people have to sign in to let them know they haven't done any business. They replied quickly - although sent the data as a PDF rather than the requested machine-readable format.

Here's how much of a waste of time it is for everyone:

Date Total Returns Nil Return Percent age
Mar-25 768 729 94.9%
Apr-25 902 876 97.1%
May-25 948 923 97.4%
Jun-25 1,322 1,270 96.1%
Jul-25 1,406 1,355 96.4%
Aug-25 1,369 1,326 96.9%
Sep-25 1,416 1,362 96.2%
Oct-25 1,610 1,556 96.6%
Nov-25 1,713 1,654 96.6%
Dec-25 1,645 1,590 96.7%
Jan-26 1,536 1,487 96.8%
Feb-26 1,588 1,531 96.4%

Even if you assume that it only takes 2 minutes to fill in their form, that's over 2 days worth of time being wasted every month.

At best, 59 small businesses reported that they sold something via RM6237. Well over a thousand businesses are clicking on a button which, frankly, ought not to exist. Why isn't the onus on those buying using the system to report what they've spent and who they spent it with?

After clicking the button, I'm always asked to rate my experience using the service. I FoI'd that data as well but was told:

This information is not held. Feedback scores submitted are anonymised and only available as a service-wide view; consequently, we do not capture or hold results specific to RM6237

So the GCA are wasting everyone's time and do not track how annoying it is.


Share this post on…

4 thoughts on “The UK Government's Low Value Purchase System is a Waste of Time”

  1. @Edent that gave me flashbacks. I was on Digital Outcomes and Specialists which also had the "report no business" requirement, and I also worked on the system that receives those clicks in 2019. Mostly the back end – I wrote the framework definition language parser, which I enjoyed immensely – but I also worked a little on the front end when needed, and so was in the unique position of being responsible for writing the bit of the system that wasted my own fucking time

    Reply | Reply to original comment on mastodon.social

What are your reckons?

All comments are moderated and may not be published immediately. Your email address will not be published.

See allowed HTML elements: <a href="" title="">
<abbr title="">
<acronym title="">
<b>
<blockquote cite="">
<br>
<cite>
<code>
<del datetime="">
<em>
<i>
<img src="" alt="" title="" srcset="">
<p>
<pre>
<q cite="">
<s>
<strike>
<strong>

To respond on your own website, write a post which contains a link to this post - then enter the URl of your page here. Learn more about WebMentions.