Social Media Blocking Has Always Been A Lie



Share this post on…

2 thoughts on “Social Media Blocking Has Always Been A Lie”

  1. said on infosec.exchange:

    @Edent as you note

    Again, it isn't impossible for a blocked user to see content - but technical restrictions means it takes effort. And, it turns out, for all but the most obsessive abusers - a mild bit of UI friction is all that it takes for them to stop.

    and (as someone with over 50,000 confirmed kills blocks on Twitter) I feel like you downplay the value of this friction too much. It made a big difference for me.

    Regarding Bluesky, I find the public blocklists very useful - I can crawl my friends blocklists and block accounts that enough of them are blocking.

    On Twitter, before Space Karen took away our toys (API access) I had IFF (identity friend/foe) scripts that would analyze followers and following data to try to determine how to deal with people.

    My mass blocking was based on follow/follower network analysis, and I probably had the most complete blocklist of anti-trans bigots for a while. They sometimes got upset that they were preemptively blocked even though their accounts were fairly new, they'd never interacted with me, and they weren't on any public blocklists.

    Reply | Reply to original comment on infosec.exchange

What are your reckons?

All comments are moderated and may not be published immediately. Your email address will not be published.

See allowed HTML elements: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> <p> <pre> <br> <img src="" alt="" title="" srcset="">