The Chancellor of the Exchequer doesn't understand Tax Law
Freedom of Information law is brilliant! It allows ordinary people to ask questions of the powerful and get solid answers.
Sometimes these questions are sensible and journalistic. Sometimes they're vexatious. Sometimes they're a little silly.
The silly ones can be fun to answer. It's a good chance for a politician to show their human side. It's pretty hard to get wrong. I mean, unless the question is "What's the Minister's favourite pop song?" and they answer "I'm the Leader of the Gang by Garry Glitter".
Someone has send an FoI request asking:
Please, could you tell me the chancellor's preferred brand and type of biscuit?
Ah! That's a brilliant question. An absolute home-run for any politician. Unless, to mix your metaphors, you score an own goal.
The official response says:
This is despicable!
The UK's tax revenue office, HMRC, fought McVities (manufacturer of Jaffa Cakes) at a VAT tribunal in 1991. The crux of the case was this: chocolate covered biscuits attract VAT, chocolate covered cakes do not. Are Jaffa Cakes biscuits?
The answer?
The leading case on the borderline is that concerning Jaffa cakes: United Biscuits (LON/91/0160). Customs and Excise had accepted since the start of VAT that Jaffa cakes were zero-rated as cakes, but always had misgivings about whether this was correct. Following a review, the department reversed its view of the liability. Jaffa cakes were then ruled to be biscuits partly covered in chocolate and standard-rated: United Biscuits (as McVities, one of the largest manufacturers of Jaffa cakes) appealed against this decision. Taking all these factors into account, Jaffa cakes had characteristics of both cakes and biscuits, but the tribunal thought they had enough characteristics of cakes to be accepted as such, and they were therefore zero-rated. VFOOD6260 - Excepted items: Confectionery: The bounds of confectionery, sweets, chocolates, chocolate biscuits, cakes and biscuits: The borderline between cakes and biscuits
Jaffa Cakes are not biscuits. The law says so!
Now, Hunt isn't the first politician to make this mistake - First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon also made the same dubious claim. But, unlike Hunt, she presumably wasn't steeped in the day-to-day minutiae of tax affairs.
There's a serious point to my ramblings. It's always easy to give an off-the-cuff answer to a trivial question. But there'll always be some know-it-all who treats a lack of precision as evidence of a deep moral or intellectual failing. This is the reason why public figures are (usually) so guarded about their answers and have everything triple checked by professionals. It's easy for a slip of the tongue or a colloquialism to be aggressively misinterpreted.
Just as I am doing here.
AlisonW ♿🏳️🌈 said on fedimon.uk:
@Edent
But.. But Jaffa cakes are shelved with the biscuits not with cakes! 😏
Catherine Weird said on mastodon.social:
@Edent if I ever become an MP and get asked what is your favourite cake? I'll answer Chocolate Hobnobs.
Frankie Roberto said on bsky.app:
My hunch is that this was a deliberate reference 😄
Stefan Czerniawski said on bsky.app:
Even odder, either the chancellor doesn't understand freedom of information law either, or the treasury really does keep records of ministerial biscuit preferences. Not sure which is more unlikely.
Ben says:
I am confused why the department responded and provided an answer. As I understood it FOI only provides access to information that the department holds, not the right to ask them to go and find out new stuff. Perhaps ministers' biscuit preferences are recorded somewhere by their departments?
More comments on Mastodon.