Comparing Solar Panel Generation - East/West split
We have just installed solar panels on our house in London. We also had panels on our old house in Oxford. How do they compare?
Oxford | London | |
---|---|---|
Latitude | 51.753738 | 51.486880 |
Panel Size | 4000 Watts | 5040 Watts |
Orientation | South | East/West Split |
Obviously, it's hard to compare exact weather conditions - lower temperature makes for more efficient generation - but I've picked a date in April where both sets of panels seemed to have an unblemished view of the sky.
This is the South-facing panels in Oxford generating 24.28kWh.
And here's the E/W split in London generating 18.59kWh.
London - despite the disadvantageous placement of the panels - generated 75% of the electricity that Oxford did! That's much more impressive than I was expecting. True, the panels have 25% more potential, and are slightly further South, but I was expecting the split to make things much worse.
I've written some code to graph how the different sides of the roof perform. This means I can see how East compares to West. Naïvely, I assumed that the panels not directly illuminated by sunlight would be basically useless. But nothing could be further from the truth!
Here's the split of the above graph.
Wow! Both East and West generated about the same amount of power - 9kWh.
Given the average UK household uses ~10kWh per day, I could have completely offset my energy use with half the panels!
There are some caveats. Spring is perfect solar weather - long days, cool temperatures, and little tree coverage. Cloud coverage can ruin the generation.
If you're thinking about getting solar panels, but are worried about your roof's layout - I hope this provides some useful information.
You can follow my solar panels on Twitter.
Reply to original comment on twitter.com
|Reply to original comment on twitter.com
|Reply to original comment on twitter.com
|Reply to original comment on twitter.com
|Reply to original comment on twitter.com
|Wish they got incorporated by default into new builds. Don’t like the stick-on-tops.
Reply to original comment on twitter.com
|Reply to original comment on twitter.com
|Chris says:
It's probably 40-50% less.
Overall, it is between 15 and 20% less output generally.
@edent says:
But, the main thing is, you can't change the orientation of your house! So what I'm trying to say is that even if you're on a disadvantageous orientation, you can still make use of solar panels.
Micky.b says:
Just a thought….. and some great info here btw.
peter mc nally says:
Richard Burke says:
@edent says:
I'd suggest either movong the chimney or plotting out the areas it shades and moving the panels away from there.
Micky.b says:
firstly ensure you have 2 solar inputs on your inverter. one for south and also for west. the shading from chimney will only affect 1 side AM and the other PM so you will still get a fair output. there are shading calculators online and you can adjust day, month and time of year to see how shadow is cast.
If you can work out which panels will be mostly affected then you could purchase optimisers for each of those panels (approx £45 each) so if one panel is shaded it will not affect the entire array (a shaded panel is a bottleneck for the whole array on that input). I did my own calculations on a fag packet and this produced a better output than removing panels from shaded areas. HTH.
Gary says:
@edent says:
Roger says:
Micky.b says: