I'd like to think I was reasonably comfortable with the law in this area but, for a number of these questions, it's not clear I would have got the mark (despite my answers being correct if the standard is "under English law" rather than "according to the marking schedule")! 18(b)(i): most likely s1 (not clear that this would have got me the mark!) 18(b)(iii): e.g. Unauthorised acts with intent to impair (s3), or making/supplying articles for use in a non-s2 offence (neither of which are on the list of answers, despite it being a different offence to s1, so not sure I would have got the mark) 18(c): question is too imprecise, as there is no legal definition of "clone". If Mikal reflashed a phone with the IMEI of the target's device, he committed an offence under s1 Mobile Telephones (Re-programming) Act 2002. If it was the purposes of intercept, he may also commit an inchoate offence such as attempt, even if he never gets to carry out the interception, or if it wouldn't work. (I am reasonably familiar with the law in this area, but I would not have written "Communications Act" as my answer, as I can't immediately think of the offence! So I probably wouldn't have got the mark there either.)