QR codes - Bigger Doesn't Always Mean Better

by @edent | 1 comment | Read ~355 times.

As regular readers know, I'm a big fan of QR codes. I often castigate advertisers for poor usage, bad placement, and inaccessibility.

I can just imagine how the conversation at the offices of Success Appointments went...

"Dave, we need a QR code on our advert!"
"Righto, Fred!"
"It'll be on the tube, so it has to work offline."
"How about a VCARD - that way when you scan it, our address will appear on your phone?"
"Perfect! But..."
"Can we make it nice and prominent?"
"Of course..."

Massive QR Code

Let's take a closer look at this behemoth:

Massive QR Code Detail

What surprised me most was, once I waited for the train platform to clear, and pushed myself up against the wall so I could fit the code in my viewfinder, the code scanned!

Massive QR Decoded

This QR code has set the Error Correction to "High". That's usually a good idea when the code is likely to get dirty or damaged - but it does rather balloon the code.

Let's take a look at the payload:

TEL:020 7759 7337
ADR:;;York House, 23 Kingsway;London;;WC2B 6UJ;
ORG:Find Your Perfect Job

There's a whole host of empty fields, needlessly inflating the code size. The phone number is incorrectly spaced and doesn't have international formatting.

If they were sensible about it, dropping the redundant fields and dropping the error correction, they'd end up with a code like this:
Compressed QR

That's a code less than half the size. Same functionality and much easier to scan. And, hopefully, looking slightly less ridiculous.

One thought on “QR codes - Bigger Doesn't Always Mean Better

  1. dhmnjkflg says:

    Shear size may have been an intentional attempt to get people to scan it out of shear WTF factor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.