<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://shkspr.mobi/blog/wp-content/themes/edent-wordpress-theme/rss-style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	    xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	   xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	  xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Government Statement on the Proposed P2P File-Sharing Legislation &#8211; Terence Eden’s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2009/08/government-statement-on-the-proposed-p2p-file-sharing-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://shkspr.mobi/blog</link>
	<description>Regular nonsense about tech and its effects 🙃</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 19:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Government Statement on the Proposed P2P File-Sharing Legislation]]></title>
		<link>https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2009/08/government-statement-on-the-proposed-p2p-file-sharing-legislation/</link>
					<comments>https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2009/08/government-statement-on-the-proposed-p2p-file-sharing-legislation/#comments</comments>
				<dc:creator><![CDATA[@edent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing is caring]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shkspr.mobi/blog/?p=432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Like many people, I&#039;m upset with the direction the Government has taken with regard to &#34;ilicit P2P file sharing&#34;.  They&#039;ve released a document entitled GOVERNMENT STATEMENT ON THE PROPOSED P2P FILE-SHARING LEGISLATION.  It&#039;s only 5 pages long, I really suggest you read it.  Being part of a democracy means you&#039;re allowed to talk to the decision makers, so I called the number at the end of the …]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many people, I'm upset with the direction the Government has taken with regard to "ilicit P2P file sharing".</p>

<p>They've released a document entitled <a href="http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file52658.pdf">GOVERNMENT STATEMENT ON THE PROPOSED P2P FILE-SHARING LEGISLATION</a>.&nbsp; It's only 5 pages long, I really suggest you read it.</p>

<p>Being part of a democracy means you're allowed to talk to the decision makers, so I called the number at the end of the document and  had a very interesting call with Adrian Brazier.</p>

<p>These notes are taken off the hoof - I didn't record the call.</p>

<p>I asked a range of questions.</p>

<p>Q1) What are the punishments for copyright holders who make false claims about an Internet user (whether malicious or not</p>

<p>A1) None. Yet.&nbsp; A good point that they hadn't thought of.</p>

<p>Q2) What standard of proof will a Copyright Holder have to provide an ISP?</p>

<p>A2) This will be worked out by Ofcom.&nbsp; It will (probably) be of a similar level of proof as required by law. The standard of proof has not yet been published because it is up to Ofcom to formulate.</p>

<p>Q3) I pointed out that if a Copyright Holder had the standard of proof required for court, why wouldn't they just go to court?</p>

<p>A3) Save everyone the cost and trauma.&nbsp; Going to court is an expensive and protracted business for all involved, if a simple letter will stop someone breaking the law, that's probably better for all involved.</p>

<p>Q4) ISPs are not lawyers and judges - how can they tell if a claim is valid. If the claim is invalid - does their customer have the right to sue them (or the Copyright Holder)?</p>

<p>A4) A good point not yet addressed.&nbsp; If a user is falsely accused, they should have the power of redress.</p>

<p>I was highly impressed with the thought given to the answers - even if I disagree with their conclusions.&nbsp; Full credit to Adrian for taking the time to listen to my points.&nbsp; The above is my interpretation of his answers - any mistakes are mine and mine alone.</p>

<p>Please - if you care about Digital Britain,<a href="http://www.berr.gov.uk/consultations/page51696.html"> respond to the consultation</a>. An simple email to adrian.brazier@bis.gsi.gov.uk or mike.klym@bis.gsi.gov.uk will do, you can telephone them on : 020 7215 1295/4165.&nbsp; If you're feeling old-skool, write to Communications &amp; Content Industries Unit, BIS, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET.</p>

<p>It only takes a few minutes of your time to ensure that the Government don't make a massive mistake.&nbsp; If you are going to phone or email - please remain polite.</p>
<img src="https://shkspr.mobi/blog/wp-content/themes/edent-wordpress-theme/info/okgo.php?ID=432&HTTP_REFERER=RSS" alt="" width="1" height="1" loading="eager">]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2009/08/government-statement-on-the-proposed-p2p-file-sharing-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
